Cette liste est non exhaustive et classée par ordre chronologique

- Wendl MC. H-index: however ranked, citations need context. Nature. 2007 Sep 27;449(7161):403

- Ball P. Achievement index climbs the ranks. Nature 2007;448(7155):737.

- Ben Abdelaziz A, Abdelali M, Khmakhem A. Bibliometric profile of Tunisians medicals publications indexed in Medline from 2000 to 2003. Part 3: International radiance. Tunis Med 2007;85(2):96-101.

- Bhandari M, Busse J, Devereaux PJ, Montori VM, Swiontkowski M, Tornetta Iii P, et al. Factors associated with citation rates in the orthopedic literature. Can J Surg 2007;50(2):119-23. - Bojko K. [Factors of evaluation and interaction of scientific journals--impact factor and interjournal impact factor]. Wiad Lek 2007;60(1-2):98-104.

- Cameron N. Impact factors and research quality. Ann Hum Biol 2007;34(1):13-5.

- Currie GM, Wheat JM. Impact factors in nuclear medicine journals. J Nucl Med 2007;48(8):1397-400.

- Gamba G. [The best article of the year 2006]. Rev Invest Clin 2007;59(1):4-7.

- Hughes G. Impact factors and consent to publish. Emerg Med J 2007;24(6):384.

- Hussain FN, Husnain A. Impact factor: is it an essential tool to assess a medical journal? J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2007;17(6):382-3.

- Jeang KT. Impact factor, H index, peer comparisons, and Retrovirology: is it time to individualize citation metrics? Retrovirology 2007;4:42.

- Mervis J. Scientific publishing. U.S. output flattens, and NSF wonders why. Science 2007;317(5838):582.

- Ohba N, Nakao K, Isashiki Y, Ohba A. The 100 most frequently cited articles in ophthalmology journals. Arch Ophthalmol 2007;125(7):952-60.

- Parthasarathy H. Measures of impact. PLoS Biol 2005;3(8):e296.

- Pujol E, Rodriguez D, Barcelo E. [Primary health care publications visibility]. Med Clin (Barc) 2007;128(20):795-7.

- Rehfeld JF, Nielsen LB, Jorgensen HL. [The dance about the "impact factor"]. Ugeskr Laeger 2007;169(24):2317.

- Tavares H, Miguel EC, Mari Jde J, Rohde LA, Mercadante MT, Bressan RA. [Bibliometrics and visibility of the Brazilian psychiatry.]. Rev Bras Psiquiatr 2007;29(2):99.

- Villar Alvarez F, Estrada Lorenzo JM, Perez Andres C, Rebollo Rodriguez MJ. [Bibliometric study of the original articles published in Revista Espanola de Salud Puiblica (1991-2000). Part III: reference analysis]. Rev Esp Salud Publica 2007;81(3):247-59.

- Burnham J.F. Scopus database : a review.[enligne] Biomedical Digital Libraries, 2006, vol.3, n°1. Disponible sur :<http://www.bio-diglib.com/content/3/1/1> (consulté le 14/04/2008)

- McCook A.Is peer review broken ? The Scientist, 2006, vol.20, n°2, pp. 26-34.

- Ball P. Index aims for fair ranking of scientists. Nature, 2005, vol.436, n°7053, pp.900.

- Braun T., Diospatonyi I. US scientists dominate as journal gatekeepers. The Scientist, 2005, vol.19, n°5, pp. 10.

- Braun T., Diospatonyi I. The counting of core journal gatekeepers as science indicators really counts. The scientific scope of action and strength of nations. Scientometrics, 2005, vol.62, n°3, pp. 297-319.

- Hirsch J.E. An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. PNAS, 2005, vol.102, n°46, pp. 16569-16572.

- Baudoin L., Peltier C., Graillot-Gak C., et al. Zoom sur l'excellence en recherche biomédicale en France. [en ligne]. Médecine Sciences, 2004, vol.20, n°12, pp. 1149-55. Disponible sur: <http://www.erudit.org/revue/ms/2004/v20/n12/009879ar.pdf> (consulté le 28/09/2007)

- Baudoin L., Haeffner-Cavaillon N., Pinhas N., et al. Indicateurs bibliométriques : réalités, mythes et prospective.[en ligne] Médecine Sciences, 2004, vol.20, n°10, pp. 909-15. Disponible sur :
<http://www.edk.fr/reserve/revues/ms_papier/e-docs/00/00/05/EA/document_article.md> (consulté le 14/04/2008)

- Bornmann L., Daniel H.D. Reliability, fairness and predictive validity of committee peer review. Evaluation of the selection of post-graduate fellowship holders by the Boehringer Ingelheim Fonds. B.I.F. Futura, 2004, vol.19, n°1, pp. 7-19.
Extrait du résumé : Une analyse bibliométrique des publications des boursiers (doctorants et post-doctorants) de la Fondation Boehringer Ingelheim indique qu'elles sont citées beaucoup plus souvent que la moyenne des publications de l'ensemble des périodiques de l'ISI (Istitute for Scientific Information, Philadelphia, Pa, USA) des sections "multidisciplinaire", "biologie moléculaire et génétique" et "biologie et biochimie". Cette étude fait ressortir les difficultés de l'évaluation par les pairs.

- Compendium statistique 2004 de la science et de la technologie : réunion du comité de la politique scientifique et technologique de l'OCDE au niveau ministériel, 29 et 30 janvier 2004. Paris : Les éditions de l'OCDE, 2004, 52 p. Disponible sur: <http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/17/35/23653499.pdf> (consulté le 28/09/2007)

- Lawrence P.A. The politics of Publication. Authors, reviewers and editors must act to protect the quality of research. Nature, 2003, vol.422, n°6929, pp.259-261.

- Hofbauer R., Frass M., Gmeiner B., et al. Euro-Factor (EF)™ : The european journal quality factor, The new European "scientific currency". Vienna : Vicer Publishing, 2002, 52 p.
Disponible sur:
<http://www.univ-lille1.fr/lea/Menu_du_Site/Publications/Acrobat/VICER-EUROFACTOR.pdf> (consulté le 14/04/2008)

- Prime C., Bassecoulard E., Zitt M. Co-citations and co-sitations : A cautionary view on an analogy. Scientometrics, 2002, vol.54, n°2, pp.291-308.

- Rowlands I. Journal diffusion factors : a new approach to measuring research influence. Aslib Proceedings, 2002, vol.54, n°2, pp.77-84.

- Smith A., Eysenck M. The correlation between RAE ratings and citation counts in psychology.
London : Royal Holloway University of London, 2002, 12 p.

- Harzing A.W. Bradford University School of Management : Journal Quality List. Bradford : Bradford University School of Management, 2001, 23 p.

- Hofbauer R., Gmeiner B., Kaye K., et al. "Wiener klinische Wochenschrift" : Publication patterns 1990-2000. Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2001, vol.113, n°15-16, pp.610-615.

- Jemec G.B.E. Impact factor to assess academic output. The Lancet, 2001, vol.358, pp.1373.

- Rostaing H. Le Web et ses outils d'orientation. Comment mieux appréhender l'information disponible sur Internet par l'analyse des citations ? [en ligne]. Bulletin des Bibliothèques de France, 2001, vol.46, n°1, pp.68-77. Disponible sur :<http://bbf.enssib.fr/sdx/BBF/pdf/bbf-2001-1/10-rostaing.pdf> (consulté le 14/04/2008)

- Amin M., Mabe M. Impact factors : use and abuse. Perspectives in publishing, 2000, n°1, pp.1-6.

- Noyons E.C.M., Buter R.K., Van Raan A.F.J., et al. The role of Europe in world-wide science and technology : monitoring and evaluation in a context of global competition. Brussels : European Commission, 2000, 220 p.

- Garfield E. Random Thougts on Citationology: its Theory and Practice, Scientometrics, n° 43, 1998, pp. 69-76.

- Garfield E. The diverse roles of citation indexes in scientific research [en ligne]. Revista de Investigacion Clinica, 1998, vol.50, n°6, pp.487-504. Disponible sur : <http://www.garfield.library.upenn.edu/pub.html> (consulté le 14/04/2008)

- Price D. de S. Little Science, big science. New York : Columbia University Press, 1963, 301 p.